CHOOSE ANY
PAPER BELOW! SAME DAY DELIVERY IS AVAILABLE
VIA YOUR CHOICE OF E-MAIL OR FAX!
ONLY $12.95/pg
WITH A FREE BIBLIOGRAPHY!!! MAKE YOUR
SELECTION:
|
Papers On Richard II & III
Page 1 of 4
|
|
Analysis of King Henry’s Statement to Prince Hal in William Shakespeare’s “Henry IV, Part I” (III.ii.93-96)
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page paper which uses this passage as a point of reference to develop a comparative analysis of Prince Hal and Richard II, Henry and Percy as presented in both “Henry IV, Part I” and “Richard II.” Specifically considered are to what extent is the king correct and in what ways is his statement limited or in error? No additional sources are used.
Filename: TGhenhal.rtf
Analysis of William Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” and “Richard III"
[ send me this paper ]
A 10 page paper which examines how Shakespeare’s view of kingship is represented in these plays. No additional sources are used.
Filename: TGmacric.rtf
Bolingbroke and Richard II / Wars Of Blood And Land
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page paper analyzing the twin motifs of blood and land in Shakespeare's Richard II. The paper shows that the play was really designed to argue that lineage was not necessarily the best determinant of good government in order to uphold his own sovereign's legitimate title to the throne. No additional sources cited.
Filename: Bolingbr.wps
Bolingbroke in Shakespeare's "Richard II"
[ send me this paper ]
A six page paper analyzing the pivotal character of the usurper to Richard's throne. Particular attention is paid to the differences between Bolingbroke and Richard, and the reasons behind the success of Bolingbroke's reign after Richard was deposed. Bibliography lists four sources.
Filename: KBrichii.wps
Comparative Analysis of Destiny and Justice in William Shakespeare’s “Richard III” and “The Tempest”
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page paper which compares and contrasts how these concepts would be predominantly interpreted by Shakespeare’s audience in contrast with the postmodern perspective. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: TGrictem.rtf
Comparative Analysis of William Shakespeare's 'The Tragedy of Richard the Third' and Richard Loncraine's 1995 Film, 'Richard III'
[ send me this paper ]
A 10 page paper which examines how Richard III is presented as a caricature in both the play and film versions. Bibliography lists 9 sources.
Filename: TGrichrd.wps
Comparative Analysis of William Shakespeare’s “Richard II” and “1 Henry IV”
[ send me this paper ]
A 2.5 page paper which examines how “1 Henry IV” is both a sequel to “Richard II” and yet also a play that is distinctly different in structure, theme, and content, concentrating on the major differences between the two. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: TGhenric.rtf
Comparative Analysis of William Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of King Lear” and “The Tragedy of Richard III”
[ send me this paper ]
A 10 page paper which examines how each play explores the theme of appearance and reality. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: TGklrich.rtf
Critiques of "Richard III"
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page paper discusses Shakespeare's play "Richard III," and critical reaction to it. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: HVCritR3.rtf
Deconstructing Film and Cross-Referencing Shakespeare’s “Hamlet" and “Richard the Third”
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page report discusses the fact
that the unique aspect of the universality of very well-known
works being turned into a cinema application is that the audience
has easy access to the original text and, in fact, may have seen
the story presented in a different context, in a number of
circumstances. They are likely to know the story and are
interested to see how it will be presented in a new format.
Therefore, the ability to cross-reference the original work by
Shakespeare and the modern adaptation serve as a valuable tool in
defining style, impact, and effectiveness of the film adaptation
of one of Shakespeare’s works. No sources listed.
Filename: BWdecon.
Hamlet or King Richard II: Tragic Hero
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page paper which examines the
Shakespearean characters, Hamlet and King Richard II, and analyzes which would be
more characteristic of Aristotle's tragic hero. The paper argues that Hamlet is a more
sympathetic character and thus more of a tragic hero. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: RAhmlthr.rtf
How William Shakespeare’s Evil Richard III Rewrites History
[ send me this paper ]
An 8 page paper which examines how Shakespeare’s Richard III rewrites history by portraying him as little more than a deformed and evil caricature despite his intelligence, cunning, and psychological astuteness. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: TGrichiii.rtf
Interpretations of "Richard III"
[ send me this paper ]
This 8 page paper discusses the Ian McKellen and Al Pacino versions of "Richard III" and compares them to the text itself. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: HVRicrd3.rtf
King Richard III and Queen Elizabeth
[ send me this paper ]
King Richard the Third is known
historically as well as through the plays of William Shakespeare to be a
notoriously evil man who seeks power above all else and lets nothing or
no-one stand in his way. This 5 page paper presents the argument that
Queen Elizabeth is one of the few characters that meets Richard on his
own ground, without fear or complacency and manages to outwit him. No
additional sources are listed.
Filename: KTrcdIII.wps
|
